两边不讨好，瓦伦VS塞维赛后主裁判遭双方主帅声讨（瓦伦VS塞维赛后风波：主裁遭两队主帅齐声抨击）

Considering commentary options

I’m brainstorming how to address this headline. We could create a generic template that covers typical controversies, or perhaps offer neutral commentary focusing on referee criticism and VAR. I think it's good to provide options for the user, like writing a 300-word news piece, a balanced op-ed, a bullet-point timeline if they provide match details, or a social media post. I want to ask for more context while avoiding any specific incidents unless given details. I’m aiming to keep it concise!Creating response options

I’m gearing up to craft a concise response. I want to acknowledge the user and check if they prefer a report, commentary, or social media copy. If they need something immediate, I can propose a ready-to-use template that offers a neutral perspective without naming specifics. I plan to include placeholders for important moments. I can provide two variants: a 150-word quick update and a 600-word post-match commentary. My goal is to keep everything clear and ask for confirmation when ready!Preparing the final response

I see that the guidelines allow for bullet points, so I think it's okay to use them. I'll keep my response concise and provide the article while also asking for any details the user might need to tailor it specifically to their needs. I want to make sure I'm following the guidelines and being helpful while also keeping the information straightforward and clear! Let's proceed with this approach.